• About Peter
  • About The Site

FennDaily

~ All Things Topical and Political.

FennDaily

Author Archives: Peter

A NEW FRONT ON THE WAR ON POVERTY–50 YEARS LATER

18 Tuesday Feb 2014

Posted by Peter in Posts

≈ Leave a comment

 USNEWS & WORLD REPORT—THOMAS JEFFERSON STREET BLOG

A New Front in the War on Poverty

The Affordable Care Act will do for most Americans what Medicare did for seniors.

FE_111012_Poverty2.jpg

By Peter FennFeb. 10, 2014One comment SHARE

Buried in Sunday’s Washington Post was a small notice of a study on senior citizens living in poverty. The numbers have plummeted from the late 1960s, according to a study of census data done by the Akron Beacon Journal.

27 percent of seniors were living in poverty more than 40 years ago, compared to only 9 percent today. There are 3.7 million seniors living in poverty today as compared to 5.2 million in 1969, while the number of seniors has more than doubled during that time, up to 40.6 million.

So who says President Lyndon Baines Johnson’s War on Poverty was a failure?

[See a collection of political cartoons on Obamacare.]

The reasons for this drastic reduction can be placed squarely on retirement programs like 401(k)s, Social Security and the establishment of Medicare in 1965. In addition, many continue to work post-65, many saw the tough times of the Depression and World War II and have been careful and frugal.

Another important change that I was involved in back in the 70s working for Sen. Frank Church, who was Chairman of the Aging Committee, involved the capital gains tax on the sale of one’s home. Congress passed an exemption for seniors who sold their homes and downsized, saving them substantial sums from taxes on their primary nest egg. Prices of homes had gone up and this change was crucial for many seniors and is still important today.

But there are still too many Americans, both young and old, living in poverty. Too many are without jobs, too many have jobs that don’t pay enough to raise a family and the future of pensions and retirement savings is far from certain. A new Kaiser study even indicates that additional health expenses could raise the percentage of seniors in poverty up from 9 percent to 15 percent.

[See a collection of political cartoons on the economy.]

And that is why the importance of the Affordable Care Act cannot be understated. Before Medicare, many seniors were one serious illness removed from bankruptcy. Today, the same is true for many Americans. The ACA, when it is fully implemented, will do much the same as Medicare to keep Americans out of poverty.

Here is what life was like before Medicare: The cost of health care for seniors kept many from having even basic hospital coverage. Only one in four had insurance that would cover 75 percent of a hospital stay, and half of all elderly Americans had no insurance at all.

The point is that when we look back at American life in the pre-Johnson era, the pre-Medicare era, we faced a daunting problem. We did much to solve that problem for the vast majority of seniors. Now, with the ACA, we can do the same for most Americans.

 

Share this post:

  • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Print (Opens in new window) Print
  • More
  • Share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest
  • Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Share on Tumblr (Opens in new window) Tumblr
Like Loading...

WASHINGTON POST OPED ON WOMEN RAPED IN CONFLICT WITH BRIAN ATWOOD 2/14/2014

14 Friday Feb 2014

Posted by Peter in Posts

≈ Leave a comment

LINK TO THE WASHINGTON POST WEBSITE FOR THIS OPED

http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/the-president-should-permit-aid-to-allow-abortions-for-wars-rape-victims/2014/02/13/68cb0298-9359-11e3-84e1-27626c5ef5fb_story.html

Opinions

The president should clarify ‘Helms’ law to allow abortions for wars’ rape victims

  • 46

  • Share to Facebook

  • Share on Twitter

  • Share on LinkedIn

  • Add to PersonalPost

  • Share via Email

  • Print Article

  • More

By Brian Atwood and Peter Fenn, Published: February 13

Brian Atwood is chairman of global studies at the University of Minnesota’sHumphrey School of Public Affairs. He was administrator of the U.S. Agency for International Development during the Clinton administration. Peter Fenn, a longtime Democratic political strategist, was a top aide to Sen. Frank Church (D-Idaho) from 1975 to 1981.

An 18-year-old Free Syrian Army soldier was jailed in the fall of 2012, and Syrian government troops brought his fiancee, sisters, mother and female neighbors to the prison. But this wasn’t a regular visitation, according to Women Under Siege, a group affiliated with the Women’s Media Center. Each of these women was raped in front of the prisoner.

Sexual violence is a primary reason women and girls are fleeing Syria, according to theInternational Rescue Committee. It is not new for rape to be used as a weapon of war, nor for pregnancies to result from those rapes. As many as 50,000 women and girls were raped in Bosnia; more than 250,000 were raped in Rwanda. Reports from the Central African Republic, the Democratic Republic of the Congo and South Sudan indicate that rape is increasingly being used as a weapon in those war zones. This horrific act is designed to terrorize and paralyze whole segments of society.

And often, U.S. aid workers can only turn their backs when pregnant rape victims ask for help, because they are subject to a directive that prohibits providing comprehensive health services.

How did it come to pass that the United States, one of the world’s most generous providers of humanitarian assistance, would constrain its response to this gross violation of human rights? The answer lies in the morass of U.S. social-issue politics. So does the solution: In the midst of the decades-long disputes over abortion, a compromise was reached on exceptions that should apply equally to humanitarian operations.

The 1973 “Helms amendment” restricts the use of U.S. foreign assistance funds for abortions “as a method of family planning or to motivate or coerce any person to practice abortions.” The consequence of rape has nothing to do with family planning, as numerous legal experts outside government have rightly concluded. Historical and current political compromises have established three exceptions — rape, incest and life-endangerment — as cases in which U.S. taxpayer funds can be spent on abortion.

An executive order is needed to set the record straight: that what is done in humanitarian operations overseas is in line with the exceptions embodied in U.S. law.

The president has the authority to correct a long-standing misinterpretation of the Helms amendment. He should do so with full confidence that Americans would strongly support this action.

A national poll conducted last month by Lake Research Partners for the Center for Health and Gender Equity found that Americans overwhelmingly support such an executive order. Fifty-seven percent of respondents agreed that the president “should issue an executive order to allow foreign assistance to support comprehensive health care, including safe abortions for women in the cases of rape, incest, and when a woman’s life is in danger.”

Seventy-one percent agreed that abortion should be allowed in cases in which a pregnancy is a result of rape. Only 21 percent disagreed.

Thousands of rape victims die each year — in desperation, they seek to escape their trauma using dangerous means. Simply by applying a law correctly, the United States could join a growing number of donors responding to this pandemic. The shift would require no new law, only a presidential clarification that would allow government resources to be used when women request to end a pregnancy in cases of rape, incest or life endangerment.

This fundamental human rights issue can no longer be ignored. It deserves a presidential declaration that will right a long-standing wrong.

The president should correct a misinterpretation of the Helms amendment that apparently was based on avoiding a threat to family planning that no longer exists. It should be U.S. government policy to support the victims of one of the harshest war crimes imaginable.

Share this post:

  • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Print (Opens in new window) Print
  • More
  • Share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest
  • Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Share on Tumblr (Opens in new window) Tumblr
Like Loading...

The Beatles’ First Concert in America

14 Friday Feb 2014

Posted by Peter in Posts

≈ Leave a comment

When Beatlemania Came to D.C.

This is what it was like when the Fab Four came to our nation’s capital.

A ticket stub from the Beatles February 1964 concert in Washington, D.C.A ticket stub from the Beatles February 1964 concert in Washington, D.C.

By Peter FennFeb. 11, 2014Leave a Comment SHARE  USNEWS & WORLD REPROT THOMAS JEFFERSON STREET BLOG

I have to confess, I am not a collector.  I don’t save stamps or coins or autographs. I don’t keep old programs from plays or ticket stubs.  Well, not usually.

Seems that put away in an old wallet, long since forgotten, was the ticket stub to the Beatles very first concert in the U.S., 50 years ago today. The picture you see above is that ticket. I had just turned the ripe old age of 16 and went to the concert with my best friend, Forrest Church. That night, a couple of nerdy guys could even get dates!

Girls did outnumber boys at the Washington Coliseum and the screaming did drown out the music, for sure, but it didn’t matter. We knew all the words. We had been singing the songs for weeks and came off the excitement of the Beatles’ “Ed Sullivan Show” performance just two days before.

[Check out our gallery of political cartoons.]

Forrest and I were into music and would line up to get the newest releases but we were also into politics.  His father was a Senator, mine worked in the JFK White House.

The previous two months since Nov. 22, 1963 were pretty rough for our country and for two political kids growing up in Washington D.C. For our generation, the Beatles lifted us up, they helped give us an outlet, they provided us with a reason to be young again. The age of innocence was over with the events of Dallas, but we were still pretty young and pretty innocent.

Vietnam had not really begun to seriously enter our consciousness, the civil rights struggle was building, the turmoil of the 60’s was just starting.

The Beatles took the kids by storm but they also took the country and our parents by storm  —  we had protest music gaining in popularity with Dylan and Baez and Peter Paul & Mary; we had blues and rock ‘n roll and Presley, but the timing and staying power of the Beatles produced a wave that carried us out of the despair of Nov. 22. It lasted through the decade of the 1960s and, in fact, helped define the protests and the turbulence of that time.

A local D.C. disk jockey named Carroll James managed to get a copy of the hit record “I Want to Hold Your Hand” and played it incessantly on WWDC radio. He was the MC at the concert at the Coliseum on Feb. 11, 1964 and he played a big role in getting the Beatles to Washington.

[Check out our special report: The Beatles 50 Years Later]

Without Twitter, or Facebook, or cell phones, their music spread like a wild fire. Later, Carroll became a VoiceOver talent and did many of my political commercials up until his death in 1997. We loved talking about the “old” days when it all started.

I am glad we had the Beatles and I am glad we are able to celebrate them 50 years later.  I am glad that they were a part of our generation’s coming of age and that they lifted us out of that tough time.

I am glad I still have that ticket and those memories of my best friend for nearly half a century, Forrest Church. He sadly didn’t reach the age of 64, but for the two us we will always have the Beatles. They made us feel young, when we needed it.

TAGS:

 

Beatles, The

 

music
+ More
  • Peter Fenn

    Peter Fenn is a Democratic political strategist and head of Fenn Communications, one of the nation’s leading political and public affairs media firms. Fenn Communications has worked in over 300 campaigns, from presidential to mayoral, and has represented a number of Fortune 500 companies. Fenn is also an adjunct professor at George Washington University’s Graduate School of Political Management. Follow him on Twitter: @peterhfenn.

Share this post:

  • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Print (Opens in new window) Print
  • More
  • Share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest
  • Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Share on Tumblr (Opens in new window) Tumblr
Like Loading...

Fennocenzi Talk Debt Ceiling Vote and Republicans’ Problems with Women and the Middle Class-FOX5 DC

12 Wednesday Feb 2014

Posted by Peter in Posts

≈ Leave a comment

http://www.myfoxdc.com/video?autoStart=true&topVideoCatNo=default&clipId=9831859

Share this post:

  • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Print (Opens in new window) Print
  • More
  • Share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest
  • Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Share on Tumblr (Opens in new window) Tumblr
Like Loading...

Two VERY Big Problems for Republicans: Women and the Middle Class

12 Wednesday Feb 2014

Posted by Peter in Posts

≈ Leave a comment

  •  
HOME | BLOGS | PUNDITS BLOG | NATIONAL PARTY NEWS

Pundits Blogicon
Pundits Blog feed

February 11, 2014, 03:03 pm

Two very big concerns for Republicans

By Peter Fenn

Share on facebook2Share on twitter4Share on google_plusone_shareMore Sharing Services2Share on email

 2

Republicans are licking their chops because they see the Affordable Care Act, or ObamaCare, as their ticket to winning the November 2014 elections. All their eggs are in that basket, and they assume the political climate will be similar to how it was after the disastrous rollout of last fall.

 

ADVERTISEMENT

For some reason, they don’t believe they need a healthcare alternative plan, they don’t need to pass (or can’t pass) immigration reform, they don’t need to act on legislation to help create jobs, etc. In other words, all they need to do is to be the “Repeal Republicans” when it comes to the healthcare law to emerge victorious in November and take control of the Senate.A new CNN poll should cause them very real concerns on two very important fronts.

First, the Republicans’ difficulties with female voters are not going away. When asked “do you think the Republican Party generally understands the problems and concerns of women,” only 42 percent say yes and 55 percent say no. The same question for Democrats results in 63 percent saying yes and 33 percent saying no. That is a 21-point gap in favor of the Democrats.

Thus, whatever Republicans think they have been doing since the drubbing in 2012 is not working to improve their standing with women.

The second area is the crucially important question of who stands up for the middle class. GOP presidential candidate Mitt Romney’s “47 percent” comment has also not gone away, and the general perception of Republicans has not changed.

When asked “Do you think the policies of the Republican Party generally favor the rich, favor the middle class or favor the poor,” a full 69 percent believe Republicans favor the rich, 23 percent say they favor the middle class and only 3 percent believe they favor the poor. As for the Democratic Party, 30 percent say they favor the rich, 36 percent say they favor the middle class and 30 percent say they favor the poor.

Thus, for Democrats a total of 66 percent say they favor the middle class or the poor and those numbers are only 26 percent for Republicans, a gap of 40 percent. When 7 in 10 Americans believe you are the party of the rich, trust me, you have a problem.

Could Democrats strengthen their standing with the middle class? You bet. Should they be the “opportunity party”? You bet. Should they have a message for 2014 and beyond that they can do more for well-paying jobs, helping working families and strengthening the middle class? No question.

The bottom line is that the perception of the Republican Party on these two critical concerns, helping women and helping the middle class, is a serious issue for the party. And, from what I can tell, they are doing very little substantively to change that.

 

Read more: http://thehill.com/blogs/pundits-blog/national-party-news/198099-two-very-big-concerns-for-republicans#ixzz2t7yJxcH1
Follow us: @thehill on Twitter | TheHill on Facebook

Share this post:

  • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Print (Opens in new window) Print
  • More
  • Share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest
  • Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Share on Tumblr (Opens in new window) Tumblr
Like Loading...

Response to SOTU — WTTG FOX5–1/29/2014

07 Friday Feb 2014

Posted by Peter in Posts

≈ Leave a comment

http://www.myfoxdc.com/video?autoStart=true&topVideoCatNo=default&clipId=9805461

Share this post:

  • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Print (Opens in new window) Print
  • More
  • Share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest
  • Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Share on Tumblr (Opens in new window) Tumblr
Like Loading...

Fennocenzi on WTTG FOX5 DC — 2/5/2014

07 Friday Feb 2014

Posted by Peter in Posts

≈ Leave a comment

http://www.myfoxdc.com/video?autoStart=true&topVideoCatNo=default&clipId=9805461

Share this post:

  • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Print (Opens in new window) Print
  • More
  • Share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest
  • Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Share on Tumblr (Opens in new window) Tumblr
Like Loading...

MORE SOTU RESPONSES FROM REPUBLICANS 1/27/2014 USNEWS & WORLD REPORT OPINION BLOG

07 Friday Feb 2014

Posted by Peter in Posts

≈ Leave a comment

A Tale of Too Many Responses

GOP leadership needs to get a grip on all the Republican State of the Union responders.

By Peter FennJan. 27, 20145 Comments SHARE

 

Kentucky Sen. Rand Paul addresses the audience at the 50th annual Kentucky Country Ham Breakfast Thursday, Aug. 22, 2013, at the Kentucky State Fairgrounds in Louisville, Ky.

A Public Policy Polling survey found only one in three Kentucky voters would want Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., in the 2016 presidential race.

The Republicans just can’t get enough. More and more Lone Rangers are out there deciding that they will be in the klieg lights to respond to President Obama’s State of the Union Address. 

The “official” responder, if that notion even still applies, will be Rep. Cathy McMorris Rodgers of Washington state. She will get the network air-time immediately following the president’s address to a joint session of congress. Since the Republicans have a serious and continuing “women problem,” this probably makes sense. Better than Mike Huckabee, right?

But, not to be out-done, Sen. Mike Lee, R-Utah, will be this year’s illustrious tea party responder. This will follow on the heels of Michele “looking at the wrong camera” Bachmann in 2011, Herman “the pizza man” Cain in 2012 and Kentucky Sen. Rand Paul last year, who will stay in the limelight and give another response this year all on his own.

[See a collection of political cartoons on the tea party.]

And let’s not forget the pre-SOTU activities by Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Texas. He didn’t even want to wait for the speech to respond. Thus, a pre-emptive strike was his tactic du jour.

I get that political parties have trouble speaking with one voice, but this is ridiculous. Why put forth this collection of your worst spokespeople (I won’t pre-judge Rodgers) and muddle your message. I think this is called putting your worst foot forward.

The latest Washington Post poll shows that a miniscule 19 percent have confidence that Republicans will make the right decisions for the country. So my question is, why would Republican leadership allow this free-for-all?

[See a collection of political cartoons on the Republican Party.]

To quote Republican Mark McKinnon from today’s New York Times:

“There is no clear leadership in the Republican Party right now, no clear direction or message, and no way to enforce discipline,” said Mark McKinnon, a veteran Republican strategist who has become an outspoken critic of his party. “And because there’s a vacuum, and no shortage of cameras, there are plenty of actors happy to audition.”

There you have it.

 

Share this post:

  • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Print (Opens in new window) Print
  • More
  • Share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest
  • Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Share on Tumblr (Opens in new window) Tumblr
Like Loading...

RESPONSE TO PRESIDENT OBAMA’S SOTU SPEECH 1/28/2014

07 Friday Feb 2014

Posted by Peter in Posts

≈ Leave a comment

A State of the Union Speech That Was Just Right

President Obama struck the right balance between strong and serious, with some moments of humor.

By Peter FennJan. 28, 2014Leave a Comment SHARE–USNEWS & WORLD REPORT OPINON BLOG
President Barack Obama delivers the State of the Union address to a joint session of Congress at the U.S. Capito Tuesday, Jan. 28, 2014, in Washington, D.C.

As Goldilocks said, not too hot, not too cold but just right. President Obama was not overly political or focused on scoring points in his State of the Union address tonight, but rather focused on a vision of the future and a respect for the past. From the shout out to Speaker John Boehner at the beginning to the truly unifying and emotional end with Sgt. Cory Remsburg, the president struck the right tone.

I have been watching State of the Union speeches for 50 years and I can not remember a more poignant moment. Ronald Reagan citing Lenny Skutnik who helped rescue passengers in a cold icy Potomac after a plane crash used to be the standard, but this far surpassed it in the chamber and in living rooms across America.

[Check out our editorial cartoons on President Obama.]

Strong and serious, yet sprinkled with humor, the president once again showed Americans why they like him and believe in his policies.

This was about real people and real problems and real solutions. Not empty rhetoric.

This was one of his best speeches and best presentations. It’s a lot to move forward with, whether you are a Democrat of Republican.

Share this post:

  • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Print (Opens in new window) Print
  • More
  • Share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest
  • Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Share on Tumblr (Opens in new window) Tumblr
Like Loading...

Obama’s State of the Union: Battling for the Underdog

28 Tuesday Jan 2014

Posted by Peter in Posts

≈ Leave a comment

HOME | BLOGS | PUNDITS BLOG | LAWMAKER NEWS
Pundits Blogicon
Pundits Blog feed

January 28, 2014, 03:39 pm

Obama’s SOTU: Battling for the underdog

By Peter Fenn

Share on facebook6Share on twitter16Share on google_plusone_shareMore Sharing Services0Share on email

 1

The Republicans have already started their rebuttal to the president’s address tonight. Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) was all over this one before the text was even completed. Heck, he started on Sunday, calling on President Obama to “apologize.” What?

 

ADVERTISEMENT

And we have Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) sending out videos today, all day long, before the 9 p.m. address. Of course, there is the Tea Party ready to go with Sen. Mike Lee (R-Utah) who will bash away, too, I’m sure. Finally, there is Rep. Cathy McMorris Rodgers (R-Wash.) who is the “official” GOP responder.This group reminds me of the family dysfunction in the latest Meryl Streep movie, “August: Osage County.” Throw in a little Mike Huckabee talking about women’s rights and you are back to family feud.

Obama’s best bet is to ignore the Republicans’ circular firing squad and focus on Americans who are hurting. This is about taking concrete steps that help expand the middle class, provide more well-paying jobs and ensure opportunity for those who have been shut out. This is about continuing to fight for the underdog.

The latest NBC/Wall Street Journal poll by Peter Hart and Bill McInturff had a very interesting question that deserves attention. They asked how well the economy was working for various groups of people. Not surprisingly, the results showed that 81 percent of Americans thought the economy was working “very well” or “fairly well” for the wealthy, while only 13 percent thought it was working for those in poverty.

But the other answers were extremely instructive. Here is how many people thought the economy was working very or fairly well for other groups: men (53 percent); you and your family (37 percent); women (33 percent); the middle class (22 percent).

Note the large gap between men and women and, of course, the real concern for the middle class. In a sense, this is the “underdog perception.” Somebody needs to be standing up and battling for those who are getting the proverbial short end of the stick.

This is partly income inequality, but it is also a lack of opportunity, lack of education, lack of a fighting chance, and a lack of evidence in their mind that there are people standing up for them. This is what Obama must make clear tonight: I will fight for you, with the support of Congress, or if need be, without them.

We should all be able to agree that this is the fight that needs to be waged. We won’t all agree on the means but we sure as heck should agree on the ends, the goals, the vision. And we should be willing to compromise and come together to get things done for the American people. This isn’t about me, and it isn’t about you; it is not about political bashing or press bombasts. It is about solving the problem.

A year ago, Obama proposed initiatives in his State of the Union address for manufacturing jobs, early childhood education, access to college, raising the minimum wage, an infrastructure jobs bank, and more. But the Republican House has dragged its feet.

It is now time to fight for the underdog, not fight each other. That should be part of the president’s message tonight.

Read more: http://thehill.com/blogs/pundits-blog/lawmaker-news/196683-obamas-sotu-battling-for-the-underdog#ixzz2rjbPyEd0
Follow us: @thehill on Twitter | TheHill on Facebook

Share this post:

  • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Print (Opens in new window) Print
  • More
  • Share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest
  • Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Share on Tumblr (Opens in new window) Tumblr
Like Loading...
← Older posts
Newer posts →

♣ Welcome to FennDaily
   - all things topical and political.

We look forward to your comments and perspectives on the issues of the day. We will post Peter’s blogs placed on The Hill, USNews, his Tweets, recommendations of other posts as well as some videos from his regular appearances.

♣ BLOG ROLL

- The Hill

- U.S. News

- Politico

Peter’s Twitter Feed

Tweets by peterhfenn

Recent Posts

  • Trump Should Take the Late Sen. George Aiken’s Advice
  • Is Donald Trump the New Dr Strangelove?
  • FennDaily | All Things Topical and Political.
  • From an Existential Threat to an Existential Disaster

Archive

RSS Links

RSS Feed RSS - Posts

To receive updates, enter your email and click below.

Blog at WordPress.com.

  • Subscribe Subscribed
    • FennDaily
    • Join 61 other subscribers
    • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
    • FennDaily
    • Subscribe Subscribed
    • Sign up
    • Log in
    • Report this content
    • View site in Reader
    • Manage subscriptions
    • Collapse this bar
%d