Fennocenzi on FOX 5 WTTG—Obamacare and Congress—12/4/2013
05 Thursday Dec 2013
Posted in Posts
05 Thursday Dec 2013
Posted in Posts
04 Wednesday Dec 2013
Posted in Posts
December 04, 2013, 04:48 pm
By Peter Fenn
During the 2012 elections, the issues of “legitimate rape,” pregnancies resulting from it and the rights of women were brought to the forefront. There were plenty of political consequences for candidates who took extreme positions and showed themselves insensitive to the issue of rape.
But one area that is getting more and more attention is the issue of violence against women overseas — in many cases, horrific stories of rape in conflict and crisis.
Right now, we are hearing stories of rapes after the typhoon in the Philippines. The United Nations Population Fund reported that up to 65,000 women from age 15 to 49 are at risk of sexual violence after the disaster. Similar problems occurred in 15 camps after the earthquake in Haiti.
The history of rape in conflict situations is truly horrendous. It is not new, but it is now being talked about and investigated and prosecuted. Violence against women is a tool of war in places like Syria, Sudan and, of course, the Democratic Republic of the Congo, where 48 women or girls are raped every hour. In Bosnia, between 20,000 and 50,000 female civilians were raped; in Rwanda the estimates given are as low as 250,000 and as high as 500,000.It is difficult to get your head around the numbers but even more difficult to try and comprehend what must be happening to these women and girls.
According to a report from Save the Children, 65 percent to 80 percent of war rape victims are girls less than 18 years old.
These women and girls need comprehensive healthcare, including access to safe, voluntary abortions if they become pregnant.
Right now, the U.S. government is prohibited, under the Helms Amendment (named for former Sen. Jesse Helms, R-N.C.), from using foreign aid funds to “pay for the performance of abortion as a method of family planning.” Executive branch interpretation of this 1973 law has basically shut down use of any U.S. humanitarian aid for such help.
Now, it seems pretty clear that helping women in such crisis and conflict situations where pregnancy is due to rape is not in any way, shape or form “family planning.”
Help for these women should be part and parcel of our humanitarian aid policy.
Next week, on Dec 11, women from Haiti, the Democratic Republic of the Congo and Uganda are joining the Center for Health and Gender Equity and Human Rights Watch to bring to light the need for such comprehensive care.
They will tell their stories of rape in conflict and crisis and they will call on the Obama administration to make it clear that such care should include safe abortions for women who have been raped.
Let us hope that their words and their stories carry the weight that they deserve.
02 Monday Dec 2013
Posted in Posts
26 Tuesday Nov 2013
Posted in Posts
November 25, 2013, 05:11 pm
THE HILL PUNDITS BLOG
By Peter Fenn
Jimmy Stewart in “Mr. Smith Goes to Washington,” this isn’t. The days of bringing in the cots for all-night filibusters that happened when I was a Senate page are long gone. Holding the floor for days and weeks to fight for a cause are not remotely in the cards under current rules.
What we have is a radical change where a supermajority, 60 votes, is needed to pass any piece of serious legislation and even some not-so serious. If there is any opposition, all you have to do is breathe the word filibuster and the Senate is brought to its knees.
This is not the way the Senate operated until just very recently. Since the filibuster rule was established in 1917, it was used only 35 times in the first 50 years. In the last few years, the Senate averaged a motion for cloture once a day when it was in session.We have the rise of the fake filibuster that came about as a result of a 1975 change in the rules that set the threshold at 60 votes, from the previous two-thirds of those present and voting. The new rules didn’t require actually holding the floor and allowed other Senate business to continue. Thus, we now have a filibuster that is not a filibuster.
Think back to the real filibuster. Sen. Strom Thurmond (R-S.C.) holds the record of 24 hours, 18 minutes trying to stop the civil rights bill of 1957. The Senate filibuster lasted 57 days that year.
The filibuster was used by the minority only in extraordinary circumstances.
It was never conceived by our Founding Fathers to justify a supermajority to pass legislation or approve nominees as part of the advice and consent process.
According to the Constitution, there is a very limited place for a supermajority: impeachment, eviction of members, veto overrides, and votes on treaties and constitutional amendments. That is it. It’s not needed to rename a post office, as many of us joke.
For two centuries, the Senate abided by majority rule. The acceptance of the 60 vote supermajority is a very new phenomenon and very dangerous. It has nearly paralyzed the institution and for some strange reason been treated as acceptable by the press.
Sen. Harry Reid (D-Nev.) was right to say “enough.” This has gotten out of hand, especially for presidential appointments.
But it is time now to institute real reform. End the fake filibuster. If you want to keep the 60-vote threshold, then make it a real filibuster where the minority has to keep the floor, shut down the Senate, because they believe their cause is so great.
The political party that chooses such action will pay the price if voters don’t believe their actions are justifiable.
Now, there is no price to pay because there is no filibuster. There is only the tyranny of the minority.
Bottom line: Consider re-instituting the real filibuster or changing how it is enforced, along the lines of legislation by Sen. Tom Udall (D-N.M.) and others. But, please do something to help end the gridlock.
25 Monday Nov 2013
Posted in Posts
By PETER FENN
November 21, 2013 RSS Feed Print

A new Republican memo, according to today’s New York Times, prods the party to adapt a rollout strategy for killing the Affordable Care Act: message points, hearings, “a multilayered, sequenced assault.”
They have created a “war room” to coordinate all aspects of the attack and sent out a 17-page playbook with sample opeds, social media tactics, a “Call to Action” email chain and numerous talking points as well as a calendar of activities.
This is election 2014 for the Republicans – ‘rev up your engines’ is the order of the day.
[See a collection of political cartoons on Obamacare.]
The White House needs to move fast to counter this onslaught. It is time for an all out effort to not only implement the reform, fix the website and sign up people, but the president and his team must again seize the offense in this debate.
And it must begin now.
Much as Rahm Emmanuel took charge of the effort in the White House during the Clinton administration to pass NAFTA, President Obama needs his own war room to run this operation.
Here are eight specific actions that must be put in place immediately:
[See a collection of political cartoons on the Republican Party.]
There are important arguments that are getting lost in this furor – and have been buried from the very beginning. The old system was a disaster and everyone knew it. Horror stories were abundant for decades about cost, access, getting kicked off plans, bankruptcies, shoddy care and shoddy plans. Never mind the number of people without care or forced into emergency rooms, the most expensive form of “insuring” their health. The current “stories” don’t hold a candle to what was happening for decades.
On the cost side, the math isn’t too hard to understand. If you enroll over 30 million new people in insurance plans the pools grow substantially and the number of people paying is an insurance company’s dream. What insurance executive doesn’t want that outcome?
The critical question now is whether the ACA will be allowed to work or whether it will be deep-sixed by a concerted Republican campaign machine.
The Obama team has to engage and engage with overwhelming force. To do otherwise would be malpractice.
21 Thursday Nov 2013
Posted in Posts
By PETER FENN
November 18, 2013 RSS Feed Print

Last week, my father, who is 90, came to Washington for a reunion of people who worked in the JFK White House. Most of his fellow staffers of 50-plus years ago had passed away or could no longer travel.
My dad, who was also director of the JFK Library, remains, thankfully, very vigorous and still teaches at Harvard, serves on all sorts of boards and engages in numerous volunteer activities. His mind is as sharp as ever.
But he confided to me that he wasn’t looking forward to the coming month – to the books and the commentaries and the TV specials. Not only did they bring back the memories of Nov. 22, 1963, but they were often analyses that were destined to be over the top, conspiracy-laden and historically inaccurate.
I, too, have a fear of overdose. I was a 15-year-old kid whose dad worked in the White House. A kid who grew up around Massachusetts politics and who, like so many, was stunned when our principal came over the public address system at Walt Whitman High School in Bethesda, Md., to tell us the president had been shot.
[Check out our editorial cartoons on President Obama.]
I remember meeting Kennedy as a boy in the ’50s, campaigning in 1960, going to that final rally at Boston Garden the night before the election and waiting for what seemed like hours for Kennedy to arrive to give his final speech of the campaign. I remember watching the inauguration at a neighbor’s because our parents were in Washington on that snowy day. I even remember my friends in Lexington, Mass., where I grew up, asking me whether I lived in the White House!
Like most Americans of my age, I not only have a clear memory of that Friday, but of the entire weekend. A nation, a world, grieving, glued to their televisions in all the starkness of black and white. Hope shattered, innocence lost, a future uncertain. It was unexplainable, random, surreal.
It was the beginning of a decade of Vietnam, violence on our own streets, more assassinations, growing up as if you had been whip-sawed by events that truly altered our national psyche.
For those who worked in the JFK administration it would, of course, never be the same.
[See a collection of political cartoons on Congress.]
My father was riding in a car during the funeral with the famous reporter Mary McGrory and a number of others when one of Mrs. Kennedy’s staff said, “We will never laugh again.” My father replied, “We’ll laugh again, we will just never be young again.” McGrory somehow thought the quote had come from Daniel Patrick Moynihan and reported it in a column. It was an exchange that encapsulated the time so well.
My dad never questioned it or tried to correct it – Pat was his friend and they all felt the same way that day and for the rest of their lives. For many of my generation it was, and always will be, a defining moment in who we are and how we view ourselves and our country. To all of us, it was personal.
Maybe that’s why, 50 years later, we find ourselves with a flood of books, articles and TV specials.
20 Wednesday Nov 2013
Posted in Posts
19 Tuesday Nov 2013
Posted in Posts
November 19, 2013, 01:27 pm
By Peter Fenn
Confession: I have disliked Dick Cheney ever since he tried his best in 1975 to scuttle the investigation of assassination plots, CIA illegal covert actions and NSA spying when he was chief of staff to President Ford and I was a 27-year-old, snot-nosed kid working on the Church Committee.
His career, in my view, only went downhill from there: increasingly arrogant, increasingly anti-Congress, increasingly interventionist, increasingly my-way-or-the-highway. Whether it was Iraq and failing to take responsibility for misleading Condoleezza Rice and Colin Powell, or his defense of Scooter Libby, or his attempt to overrule the Justice Department on spying on Americans, Cheney has been at the forefront of policies that I find abhorrent. His rise in power corresponded with increasingly bad policy decisions.Yet, on the issue of gay marriage and the love clearly evident in his own family between his daughter and her wife, he has been tolerant and understanding. They have two children; they share Thanksgiving and Christmas. As the song goes, “We are family!”
Now, he confronts the ultimate disaster within his own family. And he is trying to split the difference. Solomon he ain’t.
He even appears to have sided with his eldest daughter’s political ambition as she runs one of the least effective, most disingenuous campaigns in modern memory. Really, Dick, zip it.
Mary Cheney feels betrayed by her sister Liz’s continued efforts to prove her conservatism at Mary’s expense, suddenly condemning same sex marriage. Mary knows this is not genuine but a political game Liz is playing. Dick wants Liz to win and supports her candidacy, and he is pulling out all the stops to make sure she raises all the money she needs. But he is a father and grandfather to Mary and her kids.
This is very complicated for the Cheneys, but not for most of us.
Liz Cheney is a phony. She is willing to say or do whatever she needs to do to prove that she deserves the two endorsements on her website: from Rush Limbaugh and Sean Hannity. Go right, young woman (er, go west, young man.)
This is over. Liz Cheney, as most of us who have been involved in politics for a while and who watched her wretched TV ad called “Generations” realize, this campaign was shaky to begin with but has sunk so low as to be embarrassing.
Excuse me, she lied on her application for a fishing license, misrepresenting her time in the state. Really, in Wyoming? She paid a fine. This is worse than thinking the NRA stands for the National Rehabilitation Association.
And the Cheneys have managed to engage in an ugly shouting match with former Sen. Alan Simpson (R-Wyo.), an icon in the state.
Bottom line: Liz, get out now. Sit back, enjoy Jackson Hole, and try again in four or six or eight years. Or never.
For Liz Cheney, it is game over for 2014.
18 Monday Nov 2013
Posted in Posts
By PETER FENN
November 15, 2013 RSS Feed Print
Tom Hanks in “Apollo 13.”
One of my favorite scenes in a movie is Ed Harris playing NASA ace Gene Kranz at mission control when Apollo 13 was about to burn up. He walks into a room full of engineers and scientists responsible for the mission as they are arguing and screaming at one another. He slams his fist down, quiets the crowd and says, “Let’s work the problem, people.”
That is how I feel about the launch of Obamacare. Fix it. Solve it. Make it work.
The other famous quote from that movie was Tom Hanks as Commander Jim Lovell when he said, “Houston, we have a problem.” The actual quote from Lovell was, “Houston we’ve had a problem.” Now that seems more appropriate for the herculean task of solving America’s health care problems.
[See a collection of political cartoons on Obamacare.]
We’ve had a problem, all right, for generations. We’ve failed to tackle the critical issue of health care in our country ever since Teddy Roosevelt. How can we justify more than 45 million Americans without health insurance? How can we rationalize a system that charges women twice as much as men? How can we not strike back against a system that would deny people health insurance because they had a pre-existing condition or that kicked them off because they hit a cap or got sick?
How can we possibly not recognize “we’ve had a problem” when costs have risen from $1,000 per person in the United States in 1980 to more than $8,000 in 2010? Costs going up 15 to 20 percent a year and eating up one-sixth of our economy are not sustainable.
[See a collection of political cartoons on the economy.]
The Republicans don’t want to work the problem, they want to sweep it back under the rug. Their goal is to turn this into a political football they can kick around between now and November. Five hearings in three days, more votes to destroy the Affordable Care Act. Not one suggested “fix” coming out of the Republicans in the House of Representatives.
I suggest House Speaker John Boehner and Rep. Darrell Issa watch the scene from Apollo 13 where the scientists react to Ed Harris. They put everything on the table that they have to work with in the space capsule and figure out how to bring the astronauts back safely to earth. They worked the problem; it is time for all concerned to do the same on health care. Mend it, don’t end it.
14 Thursday Nov 2013
Posted in Posts